Real enterprise workloads, with the token assumptions shown openly. Your mileage varies — these are honest starting points, not guesses.
FinanceInformation Technology
Modernizing a legacy trading system
$0.145per request
$290per month
Your engineers feed old service code into GPT-5.4 and ask it to refactor and move it to a modern stack. The large context holds several files at once, so the logic stays consistent across the change. You get frontier coding on a big migration without paying GPT-5.5 rates for every file.
28,000 input tokens5,000 output tokens2,000 requests / month
Input and output roughly balance here. If you re-run the same files while iterating, cached input at a tenth of the input rate takes a real bite out of the bill.
HealthcareResearch & Innovation
Answering questions across long clinical documents
$0.147per request
$176.4per month
Your research team drops trial protocols and study papers into one prompt and asks grounded questions. The context window is large enough to hold the full set, so answers stay tied to the source. It reasons across the documents instead of guessing from a short summary.
48,000 input tokens1,800 output tokens1,200 requests / month
This one is input-heavy, with long documents in and short answers out, so most of your spend sits on the input side. Reusing the same document set makes cached input well worth setting up.
ManufacturingFinance & Accounting
Pulling key terms from supplier contracts
$0.059per request
$354per month
Your finance team feeds supplier contracts to GPT-5.4 and asks for pricing, penalties, and renewal dates in a clean structure. It reads the messy legal language, pulls the terms, and flags anything that looks risky. That saves hours of manual review on every deal.
14,000 input tokens1,600 output tokens6,000 requests / month
Middleweight on both sides. GPT-5.4 earns its price when contracts are messy and need judgment; for clean, simple forms, a mini model is the better call.